Is Vaping Health Risky?
The author examines the possible social and health advantages of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She refers to e-cigarettes as electronic cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the various options available for teens in light of the fact that smoking has turned into a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that people should consider the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also considering the dangers of nicotine addiction. The author also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I trust her that e-cigarette vaporizers are a harmless alternative to smoking, if used correctly.
Almost all of the data on smoking and its risks comes from Vape Shop adults, and this makes it hard to assess the way the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It’s estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths every year are due to smoking. This figure is probable an underestimation, since many deaths may be the result of second hand smoke. It also assumes that people who smoke don’t plan to achieve this.
The writer suggests that we should consider the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the result of tobacco products, while providing a much less harmful experience. The problem with this particular approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, though it isn’t. Many people don’t understand how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking is to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that folks who use the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that comes from this is that because e smokers don’t feel the physical effects of smoking, they can not be deemed to be causing these deaths, when they are.
However, it is important to remember that smoking and using vaporizers are both virtually identical behaviors. What makes vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to obtain the same effect as smoking cigarettes, without the associated risks. Vaporizing offers a highly similar experience as smoking cigarettes. This means that vapers could be increasing their chances of quitting the habit. In addition, it means that they are taking steps in direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the opportunity of enjoying a healthier lifestyle.
The writer makes some valid points about the dangers of smoking. He also makes some valid criticisms of having less nicotine, and of the dangers of carbon monoxide smoke. However, his real issue is one of regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies shouldn’t be allowed to advertise their products as safe when all they will have done is increase the level of chemicals and additives that are present in traditional cigarettes. The problem with this argument is that people have already seen the unwanted effects of increased degrees of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We already have countless reports about the negative unwanted effects of nicotine, especially in smokers trying to quit. We already have a lot of stories concerning the rise of cancers and respiratory problems caused by long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been a significant factor in the spike in smoking-related deaths in the last few years.
The writer does not may actually recognize the irony of arguing against smoking through a healthier alternative, but doesn’t seem to consider the potential negative health effects of his product either. He also discounts the theory that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually turn back to cigarette smoking. He seems to think that all we have to do to beat cigarettes would be to reduce the amount of nicotine we take in. The truth is that smokers who try to quit often do so due to other medical issues, and aren’t just embracing the cigarettes to get from their bad habits. There are plenty of reasons why people smoke. The author has basically ignored all of them in his arguments against vaping.
While it holds true that the cigarettes do not contain any real tobacco, some of the chemicals found in cigarette smoking are found in the smokes. The writer seems to be of the belief that all we need to do to solve the issue of smoking is to reduce the amount of chemicals we ingest through our lungs. The argument he presents is merely not located in sound scientific fact. There is absolutely no real proof that reducing the quantity of chemicals we take in improves anything other than our health. The author also discounts the idea that the cigarettes are less dangerous than regular cigarettes since they don’t contain any of the harmful chemicals within regular cigarettes.